| |
Originally published in
The Long Island Catholic February 12, 2003
FAITH AND NEW WORKS: A BISHOP’S
RESPONSIBILITY
Having received the report of the Suffolk County Grand Jury
this week, I wish to write to everyone in this Church of Rockville
Centre to give you an update on the persons and the issues
surrounding the terrible scandal of the sexual abuse of minors
by priests. You have a right to know and I have a responsibility
to report to you how our diocese has been handling these tragic
events.
Shortly after I came here, I reviewed the outstanding cases
that were known to diocesan officials at the time of my arrival.
One of those priests was in jail. A second was awaiting sentencing.
Two others were in “limited ministry” which meant that they
were under supervision and, in that circumstance, were allowed
to perform certain pastoral work so long as that did not involve
minors. After reading their files, I met personally with each
of those two priests, discussed his situation and made a decision,
which I communicated to each one at the time, that if he could
not work with minors, he could not be involved in any regular
pastoral ministry. That remains the case today.
When the scandal in Boston erupted in the media in January
2002, I took counsel with my advisors and instituted a review
of all the files of the priests of the diocese. Any file in
which there was an accusation of abuse of a minor, I read
personally. Each such priest was called in, interviewed and,
if there was any credibility to the story or if the priest
admitted it, he too was removed from any pastoral ministry.
The media, about whom there can be various opinions, actually
was a help in at least one case in which the diocese had no
information until the media reported allegations which, once
verified, were immediately acted upon.
At that point it became clear to me that our diocesan procedures,
which worked well for 10 years, needed some revision. After
consultation I made those revisions which were announced at
a press conference held at Telecare on April 24. These included
a new Pastoral Intervention Team of a priest, a sister social
worker therapist and the former Nassau County Police Commissioner.
These three as a team handle the allegations, responding to
the victim, dealing with the priest, seeing to it that the
legal authorities are promptly informed. They prepare the
material that will go as well to the new Review Board, which
is composed of 10 persons, Catholic and non-Catholic, psychologists,
social workers, law enforcement authorities, parents and a
priest. They review every situation and advise me before I
make any disposition about the future of a priest. Finally
I institutionalized the change I made earlier that a priest
who cannot work with minors cannot work in pastoral ministry.
Much has been said about mandatory reporting. The state legislature
failed to pass a bill mandating clergy as reporters to legal
authorities about information they might have. I am told that
bill was blocked in Albany because of Planned Parenthood’s
fear that it might somehow affect their abortion services
for teenagers. Regardless of whether or not there is a law
and long before Albany discussed a bill, I voluntarily announced
that this Diocese would report all cases to the legal authorities.
We have and we will.
All these changes were made long before the Bishops’ Meeting
in Dallas last June. At that meeting we bishops committed
ourselves to the “Charter for the Protection of Children and
Young People” and passed a set of “Norms” of particular laws
which were sent to the Holy See for approval. These Norms
have been revised and the revised Norms were passed by the
Bishops at our meeting last November. In December we received
the approval of the Holy See which made these Norms law for
the Church in the United States. The Diocese of Rockville
Centre has reported to the Bishops’ Office for Protection
of Children and Minors that we are fully in conformity with
both the Charter and with the Norms.
This does not mean that our work in this area is done. Far
from it. As Church leaders, we carry a tremendous burden of
shared guilt and remorse over what has happened. While I believe
my colleagues and I have acted properly in every case we have
handled in this Diocese since September 2001, the Church’s
failure to deal with this properly in the past will remain
with us a long time. It has had a deep effect on our relationships
with our brother priests, the lay faithful and the wider community.
I can only repeat what I have tried to say throughout the
last year that I am deeply sorry for this failure, I ask forgiveness
from every person affected by this horrific scandal and I
pledge to do all I can to deal openly, honestly and responsibly
in all these matters for the good of children and young people,
the good of our faithful and exemplary priests and for the
good of all the people of God here on Long Island.
Let me share with you what this includes. First every victim
receives and will continue to receive whatever therapy is
needed for his or her good. Second the priests are given whatever
therapy would seem indicated. However, I will not re-admit
such priests to pastoral ministry; I cannot and will not take
that risk because we are dealing with our most precious asset,
our children.
The procedures, including psychological testing, that we employ
at the seminary prior to admittance have been reviewed and
the Rector has seen to it that we use every known instrument
to determine any proclivity to such behavior. Such persons
are not admitted to the seminary. Every seminarian, after
admittance, goes through at least five years of preparation
during which they are under very close professional assessment
and evaluation prior to ordination.
We priests ourselves have all participated in “boundaries
workshops” conducted by a nationally known professional who
helped us examine our own behavior patterns and discussed
with us how we can continue to be committed effective priests
without infringing on the boundaries of others. We have adopted
a professional Code of Conduct and everyone who works for
the Church or who volunteers in our Church will be asked to
adhere to it. Our schools have long had safe environment programs.
I have asked that we expand these programs to our parishes
and agencies.
All this is still a work in progress. We are learning through
experience and we are seeking to improve as we move forward.
For example, the Diocese never had a clear plan of how to
reach out to parishes who are affected by this tragic wrong.
Often priests and parishioners have felt abandoned by me and
by the diocese. I regret that and apologize for it. For the
future we will have in place a system of informing the parish
appropriately, of having the Vicar visit the parish to work
with the parish staff and explain to parishioners what has
happened. With him will be counselors as needed.
While our efforts are aimed primarily at responding to the
victims and seeing to it that our youngsters are not at risk,
I know you share with me and my brother priests a concern
for the proper handling of those priests who have been removed
from pastoral ministry. They, like everyone, will always be
treated with the dignity to which every human being is entitled.
Whatever may be the judicial process they may face in civil
court, they are apprised of their rights in church law and
I will follow the process set up by the Church to see to it
that, in removing them from ministry, they are accorded all
their rights in Church law.
Church law calls on me to institute a church tribunal process.
It also allows me by administrative decision to impose certain
restrictions on guilty priests over a period of time. These
are all spelled out in the Norms. With my colleagues, I have
established what is needed to do that. I am actively working
with brother bishops in other dioceses of New York and elsewhere
to collaborate in this process in order to ensure fairness
and equity to everyone involved.
What will happen to these priests? Those who have served this
Diocese and are eligible for retirement have been retired.
They do not serve in pastoral ministry. Their needs are covered
by our Pension Plan. Some were eligible for disability. They
too do not serve in pastoral ministry but their needs are
covered by the Disability Plan.
There are several others who are either in the process of
requesting removal from the obligation of clerical life (laicization)
or are involved in a church judicial process. If any are found
innocent, I will then make a decision with them about their
future. If not, they will be urged to pursue laicization and
the Diocese will help them transition into life as a lay person.
Many ask about costs and the source for moneys spent in these
situations. Over 15 years ago, dioceses in the United States
faced some extraordinary uninsured expenses. Principally this
came from the necessity of removing asbestos from our public
buildings. Bishop John McGann set up a fund to cover uninsured
emergency situations, principally the asbestos problem but
including expenses around the sexual abuse of minors by priests
which then seemed a small and rare problem. The parishes were
asked to contribute to that fund annually for eight years.
They did and the fund was invested. That fund has proven to
be more than adequate to cover the costs involved in these
cases.
The Diocese informed the Grand Jury in Suffolk County that,
over the past 12 years, the total amount of money drawn from
that fund to cover therapy for victims, therapy for priests
and settlements of cases prior to my coming here has amounted
to $2.35 million dollars. Barring some unforeseen tragedy,
that fund should be able to cover therapy and related costs
into the foreseeable future.
In many places there have been discussions and misunderstanding
about settlements. Settlements out of court are often the
best way to help complainants because it responds to the victim’s
need without subjecting the victim to undesired publicity.
Because there has been so much misunderstanding of settlements,
I informed the priests some months ago that I would not enter
into settlements unless so instructed by the court and that
I would never enter into any confidentiality agreement. While
such agreements are routine in courts, they have been misinterpreted
by some as “hush money” or worse. To avoid such misunderstanding,
I am following the procedure just mentioned.
You all should know that the Diocese has cooperated fully
with the Suffolk County Grand Jury process, providing them
with thousands of pages of documents and urging all the priests
and lay personnel of the Diocese who were called to the Grand
Jury to cooperate fully with the authorities. If that report
offers anything concrete to improve our procedures, I will
make those changes that the report legitimately might demand.
While this has been lengthy I have wanted to give you as much
information as I have so that you might be able to join with
me in a continued commitment to our children and youth, knowing
that we are being vigilant and seeking to be open, honest
and responsible. The work is not over. There is much that
remains to be done. We are, however, doing all that we know
how to do in order to act rightly and thus reassure the people
of the fundamental soundness of the Church on Long Island.
This Church is not perfect. This bishop is far from perfect.
Yet we continue to attend to these issues conscious of the
fact that we will learn as we go along but determined to do
the best we can for the sake of us all, especially the children
and young people. I welcome your suggestions on this and on
any other issues of importance for our life as the Catholic
Church on Long Island. I have invited Kathleen McChesney,
the executive director of the USCCB Office for Child and Youth
Protection to come to this diocese to review our procedures
and share with me and you her findings.
These months have been difficult for all of us. The laity
are understandably upset and angry. The priests of this diocese
feel betrayed and many feel isolated and abandoned. Your anger
and upset have been made more difficult by certain perceptions
about me.
I came to you in September 2001 filled with such a desire
to serve you. Yet my own character seems to some, perhaps
many of you, at variance from what you have known after the
quarter century of the pastoral style and leadership of Bishop
John McGann, one of your own. I am sure that for some of you
I seem an import from Boston which makes me suspect automatically.
I have been accused directly and by innuendo of having been
guilty of acting inappropriately in handling clergy sexual
issues in Boston. Difficult as it is for me to have to defend
myself, I must tell you that there is no evidence of that
and, in fact, the opposite is the truth. Continued accusations
and rumors to that effect are harming the life of this local
Church.
In fact, since my arrival here I have tried to work tirelessly
for the good of the Diocese. Yet my efforts to date have not
removed opinions about my character. I know my many defects.
Greed and sumptuous lifestyle are not among them. For that
reason, I have spent much time over the past several months
visiting with the priests in small groups, speaking honestly
to them, listening to their concerns and doing my best to
respond to them. I appreciate the trust and support they have
given me and I have constantly and consistently invested the
same kind of trust and support in them.
I seek to do the same with the religious and the lay faithful,
all of whom have access to me through the normal channels
of the Church. While I do not apologize for decisions I have
made which were done solely for the good of the unity of the
Church, I do apologize if these decisions seem to some to
be arbitrary or have caused anger, upset or hurt. For that
I am truly sorry and seek to do whatever I can, within my
responsibilities as bishop, to correct and make amends.
As your bishop I want our years together to be years of fraternal
communion and mutual respect and, one hopes, affection. The
basis of this must be what the church has always proclaimed:
faith in Jesus Christ, adherence to the teachings of the Church
and, above all, a renewed Christian life of conversion, reconciliation
and holiness.
I am deeply grateful to the priests who have been so open
and honest with me. I will continue to try to be a better
bishop and thus merit your support. All of us priests serve
only with the great help of our colleagues and collaborators
in the Church. I am asking especially the religious, women
and men, to be equally open and honest with me so that we
can find the ways to pray and live our life of service to
the People of God.
Finally I am inviting you, the good People of this Diocese,
to join me in embracing and supporting one another in mutual
care and communion for the good of the Church and for the
witness of the Church in this most blessed of God’s places,
Long Island.

|